A Kaspersky study has revealed that every third C-level executive (34%) struggles to speak about adopting new security solutions with their IT or IT security colleagues. The latter, however, feel increasing the budget for cyber security is the toughest topic to discuss with non-IT management.
According to the poll the majority IT workers say that the main reason their cyber security budget was lowered was that top management sees no reason to invest much in this sphere. Kaspersky conducted a special survey to explore if this situation might be a result of unclear communication between IT security staff and executives, and discover whether there is a lack mutual understanding between these two tribes.
The study reveals that, while almost half of top managers (42%) think IT-security employees should better communicate cyber risks to business, only 10% of cybersecurity workers admit they have some difficulties explaining any aspect of their work to non-IT colleagues and executives.
IT and non-IT workers also differ on the most complicated topics to debate. C-level executives’ three toughest subjects to talk about with IT staff are: adopting new security solutions (34%), changes to the cybersecurity policy (29%) and evaluating the IT security team’s performance (29%).
For IT workers the top-3 toughest themes to discuss with non-IT executives are the need to increase the IT security budget (51%), raising cybersecurity awareness among employees (43%) and expanding the IT security team (43%).
On the subject of finding common ground, the majority of respondents agree that the most efficient ways to facilitate discussions about IT-security issues are to choose real life examples and to use reports and numbers. Besides these topics C-level executives also said that citing references to authoritative opinions (35%) would allow them to best understand their IT-security staff. The IT teams, on the other hand, believe threat stories (50%) will help them to better communicate with executives.
“It can be assumed that non-IT executives struggle to discuss the adoption of new cybersecurity solutions because of the abundance of complex technical terms and concepts often used by IT security staff. The latter, however, don’t like to speak about increasing budgets since C level executives expect them to use business metrics to justify their needs “. – says Ivan Vassunov, VP, Corporate Products, Kaspersky. “Today, in a difficult economic environment and complicated threat landscape mutual understanding between business and IT security people is more important for business continuity than ever before. To avoid additional cybersecurity risks it is crucial that both teams know how to speak a common language based on numbers, reliable references and understandable arguments”.
To make the communication between IT security and business functions within the company more transparent, Kaspersky recommends the following:
- Allocate cybersecurity investments into tools with proven efficacy and present new security concepts (including SASE, XDR and Zero Trust) to the board as investment projects or even business case with calculated ROI. For example, in the cases of XDR (Extended Detection and Response) and SASE (Secure Access Service Edge) implementation, it is important to communicate that these technologies allow the burden on the IT security team to be reduced, while simultaneously improving company’s cybersecurity posture due to centralization and automation of processes.
- Use resources, such as the IT Security Calculator and reports based on experts’ observationscontaining structured information about the threats and security measures most relevant to your particular industry and company size to verify the probability of risks and the protective measures needed.
- Acquire additional knowledge to better understand professionals from other spheres. While business basics can be gained from training courses, non-IT executives have an opportunity to walk in a CISO’s shoes to gain insights into the most relevant IT security challenges.
The full report and more insights on communications issues between C-level and IT security managers are available via the link.
